Tag: Core

Thursday, July 30, 2020

Proposal: I guess the votes are being fixed by an actual player account [Core, Appendix]

Votes counted under old rules. Times out passing 3-1. –Tantusar

Adminned at 05 Aug 2020 06:16:35 UTC

Under rule 1.4.1 Votes, change the first two paragraphs to this:

Each Designer may cast one Vote on a Votable Matter by making a comment to the Official Post that comprises that Votable Matter with the Vote field set to FOR, AGAINST, or DEFERENTIAL. Additional Vote field values may be permitted in some cases by other rules. A valid Vote is, except when otherwise specified, a Vote of FOR or AGAINST. A Designer’s Vote on a Votable Matter is the vote field value that they have most recently used in any comment on that Votable Matter. Additionally, if the author of a Votable Matter has not voted in a comment to the post, then the author’s Vote is FOR. A non-Designer never has a Vote, even if they were a Designer previously and had cast a valid Vote.

If a Designer other than the Lead Developer casts a vote of DEFERENTIAL, then the Vote of DEFERENTIAL is an indication of confidence in the Lead Developer. When the Lead Developer has a valid Vote other than VETO on a Votable Matter, then all votes of DEFERENTIAL on that Votable Matter are instead considered to be valid and the same as the Lead Developer’s Vote for the purposes of other rules unless otherwise specified.

Throughout the Ruleset, the capitalization of Vote field values may differ from that used on the actual comment Vote field; these capitalization differences shall be considered irrelevant.

Change rule 1.5.1 Special Proposal Voting to this:

When a Designer casts a vote AGAINST their own Proposal (which is not in the form of a DEFERENTIAL vote), this renders the Proposal Self-Killed, even if the author later changes their Vote. The Lead Developer may make a vote of VETO on a Proposal; when the Lead Developer casts a vote of VETO on a Proposal, this renders the Proposal Vetoed, even if the Lead Developer later changes their Vote.

In the Appendix, under 4.1 Keywords, delete the entry for Voting Icons.

In the Appendix, under 4.2 Gamestate Tracking, change the second sentence of the second paragraph to this:

An official post may be altered by its author if it is less than two hours old and either no Designer has commented on it or (if it is a Votable Matter) if all comments on it contain no votes; otherwise this can only be done as allowed by the Ruleset.

There is now a Vote field on comments to register your official vote! They are automatically counted and tallied at the top of the comment thread. There is also a “Good flavour” checkbox. Votes are grayed out if the user posted a later comment with a vote. Every comment has a class of evc or not-evc for any further processing anyone wants to do. You can see how this looks on this post.

The counting looks at whether a comment author is Active or Idle before counting a comment’s vote. But it does not yet account for the immutability of vetoes and self-kills, nor does it count proposal authors’ tacit FOR votes, nor does it automatically tally DEFERENTIAL based on the Emperor’s vote. These improvements are possible but will come “later”.

 

[Tantusar’s notes: all above text is as “Admin” originally wrote it. Now it’s just legal.]

Friday, July 24, 2020

Proposal: I guess the votes are counting themselves now [Core, Appendix]

Illegal, as the account named Admin is not a Designer, active or otherwise. –Tantusar

Adminned at 24 Jul 2020 17:52:41 UTC

Under rule 1.4.1 Votes, change the first two paragraphs to this:

Each Designer may cast one Vote on a Votable Matter by making a comment to the Official Post that comprises that Votable Matter with the Vote field set to FOR, AGAINST, or DEFERENTIAL. Additional Vote field values may be permitted in some cases by other rules. A valid Vote is, except when otherwise specified, a Vote of FOR or AGAINST. A Designer’s Vote on a Votable Matter is the vote field value that they have most recently used in any comment on that Votable Matter. Additionally, if the author of a Votable Matter has not voted in a comment to the post, then the author’s Vote is FOR. A non-Designer never has a Vote, even if they were a Designer previously and had cast a valid Vote.

If a Designer other than the Lead Developer casts a vote of DEFERENTIAL, then the Vote of DEFERENTIAL is an indication of confidence in the Lead Developer. When the Lead Developer has a valid Vote other than VETO on a Votable Matter, then all votes of DEFERENTIAL on that Votable Matter are instead considered to be valid and the same as the Lead Developer’s Vote for the purposes of other rules unless otherwise specified.

Throughout the Ruleset, the capitalization of Vote field values may differ from that used on the actual comment Vote field; these capitalization differences shall be considered irrelevant.

Change rule 1.5.1 Special Proposal Voting to this:

When a Designer casts a vote AGAINST their own Proposal (which is not in the form of a DEFERENTIAL vote), this renders the Proposal Self-Killed, even if the author later changes their Vote. The Lead Developer may make a vote of VETO on a Proposal; when the Lead Developer casts a vote of VETO on a Proposal, this renders the Proposal Vetoed, even if the Lead Developer later changes their Vote.

In the Appendix, under 4.1 Keywords, delete the entry for Voting Icons.

In the Appendix, under 4.2 Gamestate Tracking, change the second sentence of the second paragraph to this:

An official post may be altered by its author if it is less than two hours old and either no Designer has commented on it or (if it is a Votable Matter) if all comments on it contain no votes; otherwise this can only be done as allowed by the Ruleset.

There is now a Vote field on comments to register your official vote! They are automatically counted and tallied at the top of the comment thread. There is also a “Good flavour” checkbox. Votes are grayed out if the user posted a later comment with a vote. Every comment has a class of evc or not-evc for any further processing anyone wants to do. You can see how this looks on this post.

The counting looks at whether a comment author is Active or Idle before counting a comment’s vote. But it does not yet account for the immutability of vetoes and self-kills, nor does it count proposal authors’ tacit FOR votes, nor does it automatically tally DEFERENTIAL based on the Emperor’s vote. These improvements are possible but will come “later”.

Monday, July 6, 2020

Proposal: Adminship Part 2 [Core]

Passes without dissent. –Tantusar

Adminned at 24 Jul 2020 17:57:51 UTC

In the rule Designers, to the end of the sentence “Admins at the main BlogNomic game shall become Admins of the BlogNomic WordPress test when they become a Designer of the BlogNomic WordPress test, unless they request otherwise”, add

, and any Admin at the main BlogNomic game may become an Admin of the WordPress Test game at any time by posting a notice to that effect. Upon the posting of such a notice, any other Admin should make the necessary profile changes at their earliest opportunity and comment to the Notice to confirm that they are complete.

Monday, July 6, 2020

Proposal: This all seems to work [Core]

Unpopular. –Tantusar

Adminned at 24 Jul 2020 17:55:11 UTC

Repeal the rule Victory and Ascension.

Add the following as a dynastic rule to the ruleset, entitled Switch Readiness:

This rule signifies an acknowledgement that the WordPress instance of BlogNomic is functional and can be integrated into the main BlogNomic game (found at blognomic.com) as per the rules at the ruleset of the main blog (found at https://wiki.blognomic.com/index.php?title=Ruleset).

WARNING

This website is testing a new platform for BlogNomic. It is intended to be used by established players of BlogNomic. If you’re new and would like to join in, you should go to the main game at blognomic.com and follow the instructions there.

Please do not register for this site if you are not already an established player of the main game.

What is this?

BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.

The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. New players are always welcome and can join in at any time.

Thursday, December 2, 2021 · 16:22:06 UTC
Pending Proposals
Pending Calls for Judgement
Pending Declarations of Victory
Other Pending Votable Matters
Current Active Players

(admins in bold and *)

There are 11 active players. Quorum is 6.

Join our Slack team!

Get an invite!

Archives
Archives

“Nomic is a game in which changing the rules is a move. In that respect it differs from almost every other game. The primary activity of Nomic is proposing changes in the rules, debating the wisdom of changing them in that way, voting on the changes, deciding what can and cannot be done afterwards, and doing it. Even this core of the game, of course, can be changed.”

— Peter Suber